Human+Sciences

Human Sciences Interpretation of questions in both Sciences: Personally, i think that the natural sciences usually have an accurate question, or one that seems to be accurate, because of the fact that we can prove most natural science hypotheses, and although we can do the same in human sciences, our predictions are unlimited and so we can never get a 100% accurate never-changing conclusion.
 * 1) If string theory was true, does that contradict with the fact that the winner can indirectly rub it in on the looser of one game, and yet although the winner is filled with positive energy he can have a dramatic negative effect on the other party? Is it causal? Experiment?
 * 2) If evaporation can occur in liquid state before boiling point, then why can't sublimation occur like evaporation before subliming point.
 * 3) In a situation of perfect inelasticity of supply of the "black" market, the costumers will only benefit completely from low prices when demand decreases, but then who will be the ones benefiting if we were to take into consideration the time benefit as well?

Based on your observations of group and individual behaviour, is it reasonable to think human behaviour can be studied? Why or why not? What problems are associated with such work? Yes, human behavior can be studied and applications of these studies can be made more efficient as the studies increase. Human behavior can be studied by recording human activity, knowing what humans want, need, desire, and so on. However, in cases where this is not so accurate human activity can be studied in means of surveying, which we've seen in the bbc site. It is very important in surveys that the correct answers are asked, for humans can answer a survey dishonestly as to quickly finish long questions. Thus surveys can be improved with human study as well, and so we can become more and more accurate in studying human behavior. It can be considered difficult to become so accurate because human behavior changes very quickly and dramatically.What methods could be used, or did we use in class, that could be considered valid for observing behaviour? What problems exist with these methods? How can they be improved? We have done the surveys in the bbc website, they were surveys that used questions and games to answer some human activity questions, the problem was the questions could get Can specific observations about behaviour lead to statements about human behaviour in general? Explain in what situations this might be true, and when it might not be true? Further to this, can we classify or categorize human behavior?