What+role+does+personal+experience+play+in+the+formation+of+knowledge+claims?

What role does personal experience play in the formation of knowledge claims?
What role does personal experience play in the formation of knowledge claims?

Firstly, there are multiple types of personal experiences that can affect your formation of knowledge claims, RUN ON SENT

there are those nice enjoyable ones, sad ones, ones where you took a risk, embarrassing ones, and many more that all straighten your thinking to what you “believe” is better. Nevertheless your personal experience builds up your efficiency in using your ways of knowing as you gain experience using these ways of knowing.

Taking a good example such as Plato, who claimed that knowledge is “justified true belief,” he claimed that after he made a formation or strategy, based on as many useful personal experiences and gained knowledge, mixing it up with his understanding. Thus after making a formation, he has made his knowledge claim.

The way he has made his formation could be completely different than the way, for example Adam would, but they could end up with an extremely close answer that people may believe they were one and the same claim. I think this happens because people use their ways of knowing in a different way. This is related to their preferences. PREFERENCES ARE NOT JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF

Just like a Mac, every person has knowledge preferences, taking our two friends for instance, Adam could believe in the quote “seeing is believing” thus his mind has a preference of using perception as his best, must trusted, way of knowing, while Plato could just be sitting on a chair smoking a pipe his whole life, and just reason, asking himself questions and gaining knowledge through his reasoning of previously gained knowledge. That’s why Plato and Adam could have similar claims but at the same time disagree, and if we add a third person, me, there would be more variety, so I could have similar preferences to both of them and even farther preferences to both, than they have between each other. THIS IS A GREAT EXAMPLE TO DISCUSS MORE. HOW DO THEY JUSTIFY THEIR BELIEF HERE?

Considering that listening can form a personal experience, then listening to each other’s personal knowledge claims can also cause an effect on your formation and cause you to resolve a different conclusion. Thus our claims are alternating continually. And this is due to personal experience gained. I would like to conclude this to my own personal claim, the role personal experience plays in the formation of knowledge claims is a very great role, adding to that, the role of belief is just as great, for you cannot know something for sure unless you believe it at first, unless you’re a special case. But the vice versa of that’s completely different, I can believe something I do not know, and so knowledge means you believe but it is not equal to belief at all. Thus my personal knowledge claim is that I believe Plato to be wrong and that “knowledge is not justified true belief,” but notice that that is what I believe and not something I know is true. I have no evidence or proof yet but I believe that, the same way he believes knowledge to be “justified true belief.”

Please upload this as a Word Doc as well. Also, format it so it can be more easily read. A Klatt